Off-Topic: Ban The Ban Ban
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,226 messages
Updated 8/28/2024 4:39:15 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,917 messages
Updated 9/8/2024 2:34:20 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
lakngulf
-
|
Subject:
|
Ban The Ban Ban
|
Date:
|
3/16/2017 9:42:09 AM
|
|
I am betwitxt and between on the travel slowdown. I think administrative actions can take care of most of what they are trying to do.
Also, if it is for 90 days to fix our vetting, perhaps we fix our vetting instead of issuing the ban.
But on a more important note: A judge CANNOT make a ruling with this reasoining.....
this is a religious ban, even though it explicity states otherwise.
this would be an ok ban if someone else was president.
I have to rule on this based on campaign rhetoric!
What????
|
|