Off-Topic: How bad Hillary's campaign was
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,230 messages
Updated 10/1/2024 3:25:28 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,041 messages
Updated 10/17/2024 9:59:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MartiniMan
-
|
Subject:
|
How bad Hillary's campaign was
|
Date:
|
2/19/2018 5:27:06 PM
|
|
Yeah, think about it. They spent at the absolute high end 0.17% of what Hillary spent to lose. And if you want to really get a laugh check out what Podesta is out there saying. He thinks the amount is not what's important but that they focused on the states that Hillary narrowly lost. Even the network babe at cnnBS wasn't buying that and asked him how it was that they knew which states to focus on while their campaign didn't. It is utterly hilarious watching him twist in the wind. He must enjoy humilitating himself on TV because he does it so well.
The fact is that no one thought Trump was going to win. Hillary didn't, Obama didn't, the scumbag policital appointees and their left wing minions like Strozk and Page didn't, Trump didn't, MartiniMan didn't and the Russians certainly didn't. They just wanted to disrupt our political system no matter who won. They just didn't imagine in their wildest dreams that Democrats, left wing nuts and the govt media, but I repeat myself, would take it this far. The laughter and the vodka are flowing at the Kremlin with the useful idiots we have here in this country.
|
|