Off-Topic: Roe v Wade overturned?
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,226 messages
Updated 8/28/2024 4:39:15 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,916 messages
Updated 9/8/2024 1:34:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MartiniMan
-
|
Subject:
|
Roe v Wade overturned?
|
Date:
|
5/3/2022 11:19:13 AM
|
|
I have great emapthy for women that experience an unwanted pregnancy and financially support crisis pregnancy centers. But the reality is the vast majority of abortions are for convenience rather than truly awful circumstances. But given that the vast majority of women made a choice that put them in that situation my greater loyalty is to the innocent baby who had no choice and has no voice and can be denied the fundamental human right to life. Others are free to disagree with me and I am happy to discuss my position. But hopefully they will they no longer be able to say it is "the law of the land".
The problem with Roe v Wade is that it was wrongly decided and has created all the conflict by making up a right to privacy that simply does not exist. Once it is moved to the states where it belongs the issue can be decided by elected officials and not by the courts. And if enough people in a state elect politicans that oppose abortion it will be outlawed. If not, it won't but that will be the work of those on both sides of the issue.
|
|