Off-Topic: No Earmarks in Spending Bill
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,220 messages
Updated 7/23/2024 3:09:23 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,787 messages
Updated 7/26/2024 4:03:04 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,199 messages
Updated 7/19/2024 2:31:51 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Talullahhound The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   No Earmarks in Spending Bill
Date:   4/12/2009 12:36:56 PM

Well, maybe she has "pork" and "earmarks" confused. There can be "pork" earmarks, but there can also be legitimate earmarks.
We used to get earmarks for providing assistance for counter-drug programs in Latin America. They laid out specific amounts for specific activities and laid out specific parameters about how the money could be used.

Having said that, Does anyone really pay any attention to Pelosi and what she says? She's an idiot.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
No Earmarks in Spending Bill - water_watcher - 4/12/2009 10:12:31 AM
     No Earmarks in Spending Bill - Talullahhound - 4/12/2009 12:36:56 PM
          No Earmarks in Spending Bill - MrHodja - 4/12/2009 2:17:44 PM
               No Earmarks in Spending Bill - muddauber - 4/12/2009 2:50:27 PM
                    No Earmarks in Spending Bill - Summer Lover - 4/14/2009 9:32:31 AM



Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal