(Lake Martin Specific)
111,226 messages
Updated 8/28/2024 4:39:15 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,917 messages
Updated 9/8/2024 2:34:20 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Talullahhound
-
|
Subject:
|
There is a Remote 4th
|
Date:
|
5/16/2009 9:47:42 PM
|
|
possibility. That they never told her in the first place, because they didn't want her to know what is going on. You know, People in the Departments are sometimes very careful what they tell people on the Hill, because they can't trust them not to leak it to the media or create a bruhaha to try to get it stopped. As crafty a politician as she is, she has nothing on other crafty politicans of the opposite persuasion.
I'm no fan of Nancy Pelosi, and would be happy to see her go. Maybe she wasn't smart enough to understand what she was being told. However, she wouldn't be the first politican to claim "no knowledge" when it looked like they might be culpable too.
I don't think anyone should be prosecuted for what happened. I don't necessarily agree with EIT, unless I had more facts about what we got versus what we would have gotten from other means, but it happened, and I think it is in the best interest of the national security to believe that everyone acted with the best of intentions at the time, given the information that they had. Looking back never seems to get us anywhere.
|
|