Logan Martin Lake Topics: VERY informative article.....
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,319 messages
Updated 7/5/2024 7:54:28 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,787 messages
Updated 7/26/2024 4:03:04 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,199 messages
Updated 7/19/2024 2:31:51 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Osms The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   VERY informative article.....
Date:   3/19/2006 9:05:28 AM

Finally, a clear, concise article that explains the reason for the legislation.
It appears that :

1. Development opportunities started the bill and concerned lake users across the state pushed it forward. Job opportunities always get catch the legislator's eye.

2. Sewage concerns are the primary reason for the desire to prohibit large boats and houseboats.

3. Restricting speed is a reason for restructuring the bill. Guys, get a sailboat is you want a big boat. I guess sailers don't create sewage. There was no mention of noise.

4. Notice that wake is not mentioned. As has been pointed out, all boats create wake; the problem is not the boat , it's the operator. Until the operators become more considerate we will have a wake problem. I've had families in 24' boats pass, at slow plane, by my swim platform (with swimmers in the water) not more the 40' away and throw a 2+' wake. Unfortunately, you can't legislate stupidity and carelessness.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
VERY informative article..... - LifeTime Laker - 3/19/2006 7:39:24 AM
     VERY informative article..... - Osms - 3/19/2006 9:05:28 AM
     I read it - roswellric - 3/19/2006 9:32:28 AM
          I read it - jawjagal - 3/19/2006 10:19:03 AM
               I read it - JohnGalt - 3/19/2006 9:32:11 PM
                    To John Galt - jawjagal - 3/20/2006 5:20:15 AM
                         To John Galt - JohnGalt - 3/20/2006 6:29:56 AM
                              To John Galt - jawjagal - 3/20/2006 8:50:29 AM
          Answer to Ric and Don - Osms - 3/19/2006 6:25:53 PM
               Haven't you heard? - longtimer - 3/19/2006 8:05:06 PM
               Answer to OSMS - roswellric - 3/19/2006 9:04:18 PM
                    Besides - roswellric - 3/19/2006 9:06:06 PM
               Actually - roswellric - 3/20/2006 9:15:23 AM
                    Actually - Osms - 3/20/2006 12:46:17 PM
                         WRONG!!! - AnchorbayDon - 3/20/2006 11:16:32 PM
                              WRONG!!! - Osms - 3/21/2006 8:48:50 AM
                         Actually - str8tup - 3/22/2006 7:20:22 PM
               Answer to Ric and Don - str8tup - 3/22/2006 7:23:45 PM
     Points to ponder - AnchorbayDon - 3/19/2006 10:41:23 AM
          Points to ponder - fountain - 3/20/2006 1:08:34 PM
          This one made me laugh: - HoosierDaddy - 3/21/2006 9:45:07 AM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal