Off-Topic: US Sovereignty
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,319 messages
Updated 7/5/2024 7:54:28 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,787 messages
Updated 7/26/2024 4:03:04 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,199 messages
Updated 7/19/2024 2:31:51 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Yankee06 The author of this post is registered as a member
Subject:   US Sovereignty
Date:   10/21/2009 10:55:52 PM

Hey Lot,
-I placed this same this clip below under the Climate Blackmail thread, but didn't get much comment.
-The sad thing here is that Obama was for this treaty prior to being president, ...it was brought up during the campaign, but no one seemed to care,--including McCain. Since his election, Obama has not commented on it. If I remember, teh price tag for the US is something like 8% of our GDP.
-THis of course is a big rip off. Very doubrful that even this senate would vote in favor of it.
-However, if teh administration is in favor of the treaty, it can still provide the funds , or some part of them, to the UN without ever signing the treaty. The only good thing about that is that the next administration could just stop payiing any money if it so directed.
-But if this administration signs a treaty that says the US will comply , and the senate ratifies that treaty, then future administrations must, according to the constitution, continue to pay, until a new senate votes to withdraw from teh treaty (even though this treaty supposedly have a clause that says no signee can withdraw unless all other signees (or maybe some lagre % of them) agree. This requirement for our continued adhearance to the treaty results from Article VI of our Constitution which says that treaties ratified by the Senate must be viewed as "...the supreme Law of the Land."
-Scary , huh!
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
US Sovereignty - lotowner - 10/21/2009 8:29:54 PM
     US Sovereignty - Psycho - 10/21/2009 10:44:48 PM
     US Sovereignty - Yankee06 - 10/21/2009 10:55:52 PM
          Climate Treaty vs GDP - MAJ USA RET - 10/22/2009 9:20:39 AM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal