Off-Topic: Consensus

Logan Martin Lake Topics

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

4,319 messages

Updated 7/5/2024 7:54:28 AM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,722 messages

Updated 7/6/2024 9:48:59 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,198 messages

Updated 6/19/2024 3:45:44 AM

Logan Martin Lake Fishing

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

126 messages

Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,171 messages

Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,979 messages

Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	MAJ USA RET -
	Subject:	Consensus
	Date:	11/23/2009 7:07:27 PM

If, in open scientific (as opposed to political) debate the concept of AGW is successfully defended and independently verified, I will subscribe to a well conceived plan to mitigate the condition. Way back in high school chemistry I learned about a couple of very important, well known characteristics of CO2 which cause me to be very suspect that the gas in anyway a cause of global warming.

BUT, I reserve the right to be smarter today than I was yesterday. Debate me; give me your data and your models. If the data and model(s) are valid and reliable, and my colleagues and I can independently recreate your experiment… confirm your hypothesis… I will join the AGW team.

Why do I hear the chirping of crickets?