Off-Topic: Waterboy, Reread What I Posted
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,319 messages
Updated 7/5/2024 7:54:28 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,787 messages
Updated 7/26/2024 4:03:04 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,199 messages
Updated 7/19/2024 2:31:51 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
GoneFishin
-
|
Subject:
|
Waterboy, Reread What I Posted
|
Date:
|
9/18/2010 6:14:17 PM
|
|
I said "will not see the expiration of the Bush tax cuts". Read it again. I am saying that those with family income of $250,000 or over will NOT see the tax cut expire. The tea party wing nuts assume that I am supporting a tax increase for the "rich". I suspect that there will NOT be enough votes in the Senate to increase taxes prior to the election.
As to my definition of rich, it is very subjective and as a CPA in THREE states, you are in a better position to define it for us.
Income alone does not define rich, rather, you have to include net assets to define rich. Earning $250,000 and living in a small town in the south is a far cry from earning $250,000 in New York, New Jersey, or Connecticut. I have done both and speak from experience.
Now, you tell us as a CPA how you define rich???????
|
|