Smith Lake Topics: Outside looking in
(Smith Lake Specific)
2,155 messages
Updated 6/25/2024 8:47:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,915 messages
Updated 9/7/2024 7:52:09 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Smith Lake Specific)
61 messages
Updated 11/13/2022 9:38:51 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
lakefun
-
|
Subject:
|
Outside looking in
|
Date:
|
3/31/2006 10:05:51 PM
|
|
You are so wrong .I have owned two properties on Lake Martin since 1990, my parents house and mine. How many accidents on the Lake are the fault of the banned boats? How many of the accidents were the fault of jet skis, deck boats, pontoons or runabouts? No comparison. You are the selfish one just because the banned boats are something you don’t like. I was on the lake fishing today and there is no lack of development on this lake which will mean more boats, and over crowding. A lot of the tree tops I fished last year for crappie are no longer there because of what you call desirable developments. I sure hope you and the majority like fishing, if not I guess fishing will be the next ban we will face in the interest of desirable developments. This bill serves absolutely no useful purpose what so ever, over crowding no, wakes, no the wind today made the lake look like the ocean, Safer, get real the desirable developments are going to bring with it a lot more ORFs ( Old retired Farts) who did not even have to take a boaters test because they were grand fathered in. Once again you and the so called majority are the selfish one’s, you have accomplished nothing but allowing the State to take away yet another privilege. This is not a personal attack but fact. You and the majority are wrong.
|
|