Off-Topic: SLISA

Yates Lake Topics

(Yates Lake Specific)

29 messages

Updated 9/27/2022 5:12:56 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,787 messages

Updated 7/26/2024 4:03:04 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,199 messages

Updated 7/19/2024 2:31:51 AM

Yates Lake Fishing

(Yates Lake Specific)

0 messages

Updated

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,171 messages

Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,979 messages

Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	waterph -
	Subject:	SLISA
	Date:	9/22/2009 11:34:03 AM

"I thought their main concern was the health and warefare of the lake? I guess my first impression must have been correct... I feel for the fools that fell for their hidden agenda.... At least the masses didn't fall for their 21st Century version of the Pyramid Scheme.."

Poor Ivan! He apparently gets confused easily and post to the wrong segment of the forum. Ivan - this part is for Off Topics. Did you intend to post to Smith Lake Topics?

I now understand how you became confused as to what SLISA was attempting to accomplish with their work with FERC on APC's application for the permit.How was the efforts by SLISA related to a Pyramid Scheme? By the way - Did you ever attend a SLISA meeting at Lakeshore or talk with SLISA Board members or regular members?

I copied the majority of your comments about SLISA above. SLISA supported the health of "warefare" of Smith Lake in their negotiations with FERC and APC. In addition to maintaining the health and welfare of the lake, SLISA also petitioned FERC on the basis of controlling the drop of the lake to meet the rule curve. Never did SLISA oppose water quality or clean shorelines.

If I understand, FERC has yet to issue the permit to APC for Smith Lake. Do you not think that these "fools" who supported SLISA were ordinary citizens and property owners who wanted decent water levels in the Summer months. Is that unreasonable!

I would suggest this for consideration. Even in years with plentiful rainfall, APC still dropped the level to 496 by September, Labor Day. Is it not strange that the level in September 2009 was around the 502 level which was the minimum proposed by SLISA to FERC and APC.

Other messages in this thread:

View Entire Thread

SLISA - Ivan - 9/22/2009 7:18:38 AM

Dumb ? - lamont - 9/22/2009 8:04:07 AM

Dumb ? - waterph - 9/22/2009 2:03:46 PM

SLISA - waterph - 9/22/2009 11:34:03 AM

SLISA - Ivan - 9/24/2009 9:25:53 AM

SLISA - Ivan - 9/24/2009 9:27:38 AM

SLISA - gabby - 9/24/2009 12:22:09 PM

Quick Links
Yates Lake News
Yates Lake Photos
Yates Lake Videos