Off-Topic: Response from Rueters
(Mitchell Lake Specific)
22 messages
Updated 9/14/2020 5:47:14 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,915 messages
Updated 9/7/2024 7:52:09 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Mitchell Lake Specific)
5 messages
Updated 2/24/2010 2:35:48 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Response from Rueters
|
Date:
|
11/27/2019 2:40:17 PM (updated 11/27/2019 2:46:34 PM)
|
|
You are saying that based on the information that MM posted that based on the site you posted in #1 should have ind sampled at a much higher rate - thanks for proving MM right.
#4 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-polls/how-the-polls-including-ours-missed-trumps-victory-idUSKBN1343O6 imagine that MM posts about one post and you post someone elses poll to claim that he was incorrect.
Rule of thumb is never trust polls good or bad - they are too easily weighted or worded to be used to move opinions not report where the populace is actually at.
|
|