|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Tell Me?
|
Date:
|
10/27/2016 5:27:46 PM (updated 10/27/2016 5:33:59 PM)
|
|
I thought it was unAmerican to question the voting process - just accept it! You sir are no better then Trump, how dare you question the election process that is attack on the very fabric of this nation, you are unraveling our democracy! - that is just not who we are as Americans.
now please post a link as to how a paper ballot was switched from gore to bush - that would be some creative use of scotch tape and i am sure that would have been spotted and documented. Link please, because at the time it was a paper ballot, not electronic.
Now as I recall there was a huge problem with chads and hanging chads and who intended what.
The recount issues was he wanted to recount selected districts that were heavy democrat, probably so his cronies could stuff a few misplaced ballots into the box to get him over the top.
Fraud on either side is unacceptable - 1 person 1 vote counted correctly
From the Republican hit rag CNN -
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies/
Taken as a whole, the recount studies show Bush would have most likely won the Florida statewide hand recount of all undervotes. Undervotes are ballots that did not register a vote in the presidential race.
The studies also show that Gore likely would have won a statewide recount of all undervotes and overvotes, which are ballots that included multiple votes for president and were thus not counted at all.
The study shows that Bush likely would have won the statewide recount of undervotes even if the U.S. Supreme Court had not intervened to stop the counting. It also reveals that, ironically, the most lenient standard of vote counting —advocated by Gore — gives Bush his biggest lead
But if both presidents are marked how can you determine who voted 1st or what was intended? there is no way possible to be able as a voter to go back and indicate what you intended one you leave the poll.
|