Off-Topic: More evidence that Wuhan virus cases were phony
(Lake Jordan Specific)
87 messages
Updated 4/26/2023 4:22:12 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,004 messages
Updated 10/4/2024 8:13:48 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Jordan Specific)
12 messages
Updated 2/8/2014 5:06:38 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MartiniMan
-
|
Subject:
|
More evidence that Wuhan virus cases were phony
|
Date:
|
2/1/2021 11:32:25 AM
|
|
I would agree with that the holidays may have had some impact but that doesn't explain a 40% drop nor the timing of the drop. The incubation period of the virus is 10-14 days so the Christmas holiday would manifest itself with new cases starting around the 2nd or 3rd of January and continuing for some time after as the new cases cause new cases with another 10-14 day delay. And the New Years spike in cases would have occurred sometime around the 10th of January and continuing for some time afterward. So what we are seeing is not what we expect. In essence the drop happened around the time the peak of new cases should have been manifested.
And this is just the peak in new cases which does not take into account hospitalizations which would be even more delayed than new cases, (people get sick and then get bad enough to require hospitalization) which is the same precipitous drop we saw with cases starting around the certification. So with the peak happening coincident with the certification of the election and then dropping is only partially explained by the holidays.....very partially. But I agree there is probably some of that in the numbers but clearly not enough to account for the miraculous drop. Any other suggestions?
|
|