Off-Topic: Chemical Weapons, not WMD.
(Bear Creek Reservoir Specific)
9 messages
Updated 11/3/2023 6:12:58 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,916 messages
Updated 9/8/2024 1:34:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Bear Creek Reservoir Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Council Rock Doc
-
|
Subject:
|
Chemical Weapons, not WMD.
|
Date:
|
10/15/2014 11:01:37 AM
|
|
Hound,
Do you remember that on the eve of Clinton's impeachment, he attempted to delay the House vote by bombing Baghdad, stating unequivocally that it was because of Saddam's stockpile of WMD. And after the fact, ABC News reported that "we have inflicted significant damage on Sadam's WMD programs" ( statements made by the Sec of Def and the Clinton WH). We all were to assume that this meant warheads and the Chem WMD program. So to say that Chemical weapons were not WMD's is a little wordsmithing, sure everyone knew that Saddam had chemical weapons, heck he used them on the Kurds. But the Clinton administration had categorized the chemical weapon machine as WMD's.
I wonder why this is just coming out now. My suspicion is that it may help justify boots on the ground in Irag to fight ISIS. But why did GWB not scream this from his bully pulpit is perplexing to me. He and the Republican party have sustained enormous damage from the "no wmd's found" crowd in the MSM. Something is afoot and I don't like it one bit.......
|
|