Off-Topic: An article in todays Washington Post
(Bear Creek Reservoir Specific)
9 messages
Updated 11/3/2023 6:12:58 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,916 messages
Updated 9/8/2024 1:34:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Bear Creek Reservoir Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MrHodja
-
|
Subject:
|
An article in todays Washington Post
|
Date:
|
1/16/2020 1:01:16 PM
|
|
It is the GAO, which is SUPPOSED to be a bipartisan group working for Congress. Seems that unless Congress put a "transfer immediately with NO delays for any reason" restriction on the President (rather than the end of the fiscal year) there might be a basis for the claim a law was broken. The thing I think they are focusing on is a staffer's claim that the reason for the holdback was to achieve a foreign policy goal. I don't know whether that is the case, or even if it is the case whether that is breaking a law. Seems like the GAO may be doing the biding of the House majority.
|
|