(Lake Sinclair Specific)
160 messages
Updated 6/12/2024 8:05:47 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,915 messages
Updated 9/7/2024 7:52:09 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,200 messages
Updated 8/23/2024 12:20:47 PM
(Lake Sinclair Specific)
2 messages
Updated 7/11/2016 10:27:09 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,171 messages
Updated 6/27/2024 7:05:46 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Yankee06
|
Subject:
|
MAGI? Archy
|
Date:
|
11/2/2009 8:49:43 PM
|
|
Archy, -Reference your "MAGI" post above, ....now I'm really confused. -I haven't been on this forum all that long, but up to this point, I kind of got the idea that you lean a little to the left, and are "OK" with taxing the upper middle and upper classes in order to insure economic fairness for those less fortunate. -But in your MAGI post above, you wrote: "... I also would expect he is wise enough to shelter a lot of his income. ....I myself am thankful and amazed each year when I see how much less my MAGI is than what I actually make..." -Hmmmm, am I understanding you to say that you are "OK" with taxing the wealthy, ..and that you are "OK" with weath transfer, .....but only as believed by the Geitner-Daschle school of economics which apparently says that it is only "OK" to excessively tax conservatives, who, paradoxically, don't believe in excessive taxes; ..but it is "NOT OK" to excessively tax liberals, who, paradoxically, "DO" believe in excessive taxation. - h-m-m-m-m-m--mmmmmmmmm, do you see how I might be confused?
|
|