Off-Topic: 9-0 against election interference
(Sam Rayburn Reservoir Specific)
2 messages
Updated 5/17/2005 11:55:58 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,965 messages
Updated 9/19/2024 2:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Sam Rayburn Reservoir Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Sam Rayburn Reservoir Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MartiniMan The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   9-0 against election interference
Date:   3/4/2024 10:39:08 AM

Probably should not be a total surprise as SCOTUS saw this as a bad precedent and a clear violation of the Constitution.  I suspect the liberal wing of the court realized if they let this stand it would be a signal for red states to take similar action against a Democrat nominee.  Next ruling that will be big is whether states can use lawfare against a President to hamper their ability to govern.  That one will be 5-4 one way or the other.  The Constitution clearly states that impeachment is the process.  If they allow this to go forward then it will eventually be applied to a sitting President, count on it.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
9-0 against election interference - MartiniMan - 3/4/2024 10:39:08 AM



Quick Links
Sam Rayburn Reservoir News
Sam Rayburn Reservoir Photos
Sam Rayburn Reservoir Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
SamRayburn.USLakes.info
THE SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal